That Egypt is in a
state of quasi-war is clear.
Hundreds of Egyptians have been killed. In football stadia,
near the Ministry of Interior, at the Cabinet sit-in, in front of the national
TV building at Maspero, Egyptian lives have been taken. There is polarization
along just about all spectra. Information is scarce and what little is
available is mixed with rumour and fed into media which routinely adds its own
spice before feeding it to a public split among too many lines. A great deal of
mistrust is in the air, between every possible faction and its opposite
number. And did I mention Egyptians are
getting killed? So we’re at war, quasi-war anyway.
Every war, even the quasi variety, needs an enemy. Right
now, depending on who you talk to, there are four prime suspects for the title
of The Real Enemy.
Namely, these are the Supreme Council for the Armed Forces
(SCAF); the deposed Mubarak and his family and friends - either in collusion
with SCAF or not; the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and their Freedom and Justice
Party (FJP) and the revolutionaries themselves. The logic these groups of
blamers follow is sometimes straight, sometimes convoluted but simply put goes
something like this:
That SCAF is the enemy is a
view held by many, maybe most, Tahreer regulars. SCAF is in power yet has done
nothing to accelerate the trials of the ex-regime’s men, nothing to improve the
security and economic situation, nothing to counteract the strong and growing
suspicions that they want to stay in power and nothing to exact justice from
those who have killed Egyptians. Furthermore, SCAF has consistently blamed
“third parties” for the mayhem without naming - let alone bringing to justice -
these third parties. This, the holders of this view argue, proves complicity,
conspiracy or worse, direct involvement.
Others in Tahreer claim Mubarak’s
men (a catchall for family and mostly business tycoon friends) are the real
opponent because they are the ones with the most to lose from the revolution.
They are fighting tooth and nail for their survival and the continuation of a
setup of which they were the key beneficiaries, both in terms of raw power and
the financial benefits this has brought them over the decades. They are well
financed, well-manned and have even foretold the current turmoil scenario in
the infamous speech when Mubarak himself simultaneously threatened and
forecasted that it was either “him or chaos”.
Yet others see the MB/FJP
as the true adversary because they got onto the revolutionary bandwagon only to
achieve their less than honourable objectives of political power through
majority in parliament and have, after securing their seats, abandoned the
revolution. Over and above the now-majority-holding FJP have not taken serious
action to promote the goals of the revolution and have clearly made a deal with
SCAF.
Apart from Tahreerists,
there are millions of Egyptians who view the revolutionaries themselves as the real
enemy. The argument is enough is enough; these people don’t know when to stop
and are acting like a bunch of spoilt, impatient brats who have been upping
their demands and deadlines as soon as old ones are met. We have presidential
elections in a few months; can’t they just wait instead of their continuous
demonstrations and sit-ins which are the root cause of the financial and
security ruin we are living in?
Each of these arguments has merit. However none of them is
correct. Here’s why.
When on the 25th (and more vocally and
effectively the 28th) of January 2011, Egyptians took to the streets
demanding “regime change”, we were fundamentally revolting against three aspects
of our lives.
The police state: unwarranted
arrests, routine torture and human rights abuses, security apparatus control of
everything from university professor appointments to Friday prayer sermons and even
bread distribution.
2.
Social injustice: income
distribution, sky-rocketing prices, widening crevice between haves and
have-nots, massive financial corruption and decreasing ability of most
Egyptians to make ends meet, let alone fulfil their ambitions.
Lack of political freedoms:
Draconian laws for party establishment, looming handing of presidency from
Mubarak Senior to Mubarak Junior, consistent and ruthless crackdown on any
potential politically threatening opposition, forged elections
These are the core reasons why we took to the streets.
The four key suspects mentioned earlier, SCAF and Mubarak’s
business buddies and certainly MB/FJP and the revolutionaries themselves have
little or nothing to do with any of these grievances.
Until the revolution, most Egyptians had never so much as
heard of SCAF. While the army is widely accepted to be no less, but also no
more, financially corrupt than the rest of the Egyptian government, they have
never had interaction with the general public and thus have no role in the
enacting, enforcing or promoting the police state. Likewise their involvement
in impoverishing Egypt and Egyptians is peripheral at most through their
corruption but not direct in any way. The same is true of restricting political
freedoms. While SCAF and the army were indeed the last line of defence for
Mubarak’s regime’s stability, they have never been used to enforce his
dictatorship.
Similarly there is no link between Mubarak’s business
buddies and human rights abuses and similar practices. Their thieving and
corruption are more closely linked to social injustice in as much as their
looting left less to go round (this was billions of dollars worth of looting) and
their closeness to Mubarak or one of his sons allowed them to break commercial
laws with impunity, laws including anti-trust, import restrictions, SEC
regulations, pricing and others. They have mostly though been rather tame since
the revolution and financial scandals are decreasing on a monthly basis and in
any case many are already either in jail or under investigation. On the third
grievance, only a few of them were very directly related to political
corruption and they too are jailed or awaiting trial.
Far from being involved in arresting, detaining or torturing
Egyptian citizens, the MB/FJP have over the decades frequently been on the
receiving end of such practices. Seen as the only credible threat to Mubarak’s
regime’s continuity, MB members were routinely harassed by police and their
leadership systematically rounded up and jailed before parliamentary and local
elections. Likewise, MB have historically played a positive role in the social
justice sphere, financing hospitals, soup kitchens and offering financial
support for Egypt’s least fortunate. Their involvement in Mubarak’s political
strangulation of Egypt was as proxy. Mubarak used the MB as a scare-mongering
tool, both locally and internationally.
Finally, there is no case to be made linking the
revolutionaries to any the three main complaints which pushed Egyptians into
revolution. None at all, so I won’t waste time. People who believe the
revolutionaries are the enemy are simply redefining the objective. Instead of a
better Egypt, they just want a superficially stable Egypt and they want it now.
So who then is the real enemy?
Well, it’s the police, The Ministry of Interior (MOI). Or
more specifically, the much-feared State Security arm of the MOI.
It is they who we meant when we were calling for the regime
to fall. It is they who have the blood of most of the revolution’s martyrs on
their hands, either directly or through the forever-lurking-in-the-background
third party. It is they who have access to the thugs who have been wreaking
havoc throughout Egypt. It is they who have used their weapons on us. They who
have kidnapped activists, tortured witnesses, destroyed evidence, shot people’s
eyes out and killed demonstrators.
They were the enemy during Mubarak’s reign, they were the
enemy during the earliest days of the revolution, they are the enemy now and
they are the key player in all three of our fundamental grievances.
If Mubarak was a tyrant it was the police which was his tool
of tyranny, the thick stick which Mubarak used to beat opponents and indeed the
whole population into submission. Tens of thousands of illegally detained
citizens were routinely electrocuted, beaten, threatened with rape, sodomised
and subjected to every imaginable, and many unimaginable forms of torture. All at the hands of NOT SCAF, NOT Mubarak’s
business buddies, NOT MB/FJP and certainly not the revolutionaries.
Okay, I like how you lay out and explain your theory, but I disagree with the ending.
ReplyDeleteBearing in mind that SCAF was a part of the Mubarak regime for decades, it'd be reasonable to assume they know what the SS is capable of doing. Which is why I find it hard to believe SCAF would leave them a free hand to act on their own accord and mind; it entails too much risk. As for the MOI as a whole, granted, corrupt units, branches and personnel anywhere within it may plot and create problems from time to time whenever the opportunity presents itself, but I don't the police as a whole is complicit in a wide-scale conspiracy against the revolution, or that they control and direct most of the thugs and the crime in the country.